2014-2105年广西晋升副主任药师技师评审和科研论文

1学历、资历条件

任现职以来，具备下列条件之一：

一、获博士学位，取得中级资格后从事本领域专业技术工作 2 年以上；获硕士学位，取得中级资格后从事本领域专业技术工 作4 年以上；获大学本科学历，取得中级资格后从事本领域专业 技术工作5 年以上；获大专学历，取得中级资格后从事本领域专 业技术工作7 年以上。

二、国家机关分流到企事业单位，从事专业技术工作尚无专 业技术资格的人员，按以下学历、资历要求申报：

获得博士学位，从事专业技术工作2 年以上；获得硕士学位， 从事专业技术工作8 年以上；获得研究生班毕业或双学士学位， 从事专业技术工作9 年以上；大学本科毕业，从事专业技术工作 11 年以上；大学专科毕业，从事专业技术工作15 年以上。 2条外语条件

一、参加全国职称外语等级考试，达到自治区职称改革工作 领导小组制定的要求。

二、免试条件按自治区职称改革工作领导小组的规定执行。 3计算机应用能力

一、参加全国专业技术人员计算机应用能力考试，达到自治 区职称改革工作领导小组规定的成绩模块。

二、免试条件按自治区职称改革工作领导小组的规定执行。 4论文、著作条件

任现职以来必须以第一作者身份在医学类专业公开发行期刊 （公开发行期刊查询国家新闻出版广电总局网站）发表本专业学 术论文2 篇以上（不含增刊，不包括个案报道、综述、科普性文 章和论文摘要等），综述1 篇（可不发表）。县和县以下各医疗单 位申报副高级职务资格，论文可在医学类专业期刊的增刊发表。 评委会（专家组）应对论文质量进行专业鉴评，并给出鉴定意见， 对于论文水平较低的不能作为评审依据。

In this study, we found that, according to the current standard split, 4 points is a watershed, about 40% of the cases, the final result is malignant. So the image is greater than or equal to 4 points, need to cause the attention of medical workers. Scores greater than or equal to 6, malignant tumor was significantly higher (87.5%), important so 6 points can be regarded as the value of malignant tumor. 1 there are 2 cases of \"intraductal carcinoma\"

are misdiagnosed, the diagnosis is blind, can accept. In view of this, when doing low diagnosis should be more cautious.

The 3 stage was slightly lower in BI-RADS set standards, excluding 2 cases of intraductal cancer misdiagnosed, and 2 cases of 5 \"invasive ductal cancer\" of misdiagnosis, previous experience is an important reason leading to the result. 3 there are 4 points above the 10 false positive, that the existing system of grading standards have some shortcomings, need to be improved.

The use of traditional 2D ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast diseases accurately in the general rate of around 75%, when combined with Doppler, the accurate rate of about 90% [2]. Effect of grading system provisional considering medical workers, equipment caused by blood flow and other factors, the reproducibility is not good, difficult to quantify. Therefore, blood factors for reference only. The sensitivity of two dimensional ultrasound diagnosis is relatively high (82%), that is particularly accurate for malignant tumors, but its low specificity (%) showed that the benign diseases of the poor judgment, misleading clinical.

The traditional ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast diseases, the diagnosis results can only give the general logistics, others are not standardized, but also the lack of uniform standards. Some are given: \"pathological\" results, says it is because the use of noun class pathology the pathology, some are benign and malignant. Clinical doctors will have a \"diagnostic thinking of either this or that\". And the malignant tumor to be cautious, diagnosis of breast disease by ultrasound in general to promote the shackles.

The hierarchical approach to this, can change the original diagnosis thinking to the greatest extent. Clear thinking, each level contains the possible range of good or evil. The guarantee the accuracy of diagnosis, and also a reliable guide, probability and risk can help clinicians understand the diagnosis results.

Compared with the traditional ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast disease specificity (70%), sensitivity (80%), accuracy (75%) [3],